What’s the problem with social learning ?

Well, there are many – one thing is that it actually works, which can send a shudder of fear up the spine of some mainstream educators. Other reasons are that people are generally not formatted for social learning and then there is the old chestnut of confusion of terms.

I mean, ‘Social’ for a start – that means time off, sitting around a table with friends or a pint in the pub, doesn’t it ?

And ‘Learning’ is often confused with teaching, or at least in the guise that many of us has encountered in school, and often far beyond.

Social learning must incorporate notions of autonomy, by its very nature.

Autonomy, doesn’t that mean independence, freedom and getting on and doing things alone ?

Autonomy, does indeed include freedom – but this is a freedom of choice in learning Where, when, and how we like, and very often with whom we like – but it is not anarchic in any way.

In social learning, from my understanding, we don’t talk about freedom as ‘independence’ but more as ‘inter-dependence’ – working / learning and communication with and from others.

If people are to learn anything they need to be taught by a teacher, don’t they ?

I don’t know, what do you think?

Don’t come here talking about working in collaboration with others – that’s just plain copying and we won’t stand for any of that around here.

Social learning, I believe, can, and does just happen, but the most effective way for it to occur is when it is facilitated in some way – I am carefully avoiding the term ‘taught’.

Facilitation ? – don’t make me laugh, how can that ever work – you need someone with a firm body of knowledge – learning is just a transfer of knowledge from one to another, or one to many, isn’t it ?

Firtly, let’s come back to the title – you’re reading this either because you firmly agree with the statement or that you disagree wholeheartedly, or maybe you are just curious to see what I have to say on this – either way, I’ve got your attention.

Now let’s look at the way education has been set up and run over the last few centuries – an insight into one of the few things in life that has remained pretty much stationary over the last two or three hundred years.

In the pre-industrial Revolution, most learning, except for the privileged classes was a one-to-one phenomena, called « sitting by Nelly », where trades were learnt from an experienced worker, showing and checking the performance of an ‘apprentice’ until they were ready to do the job alone.

During and after the Industrial Revolution, education then evolved into the model that is traditionally used to this day – the teacher and the class – One-to-many.

This, in my opinion, is nearing its sell-by-date as external pressures, in terms of rapid technological change, exert their influence on the validity and pertinance of this model.

The teacher is dead, long live the teacher – but how are kids and adults going to learn?

Enter Social Learning – we have actually been doing this for centuries, although we may not have known it – or rather not really thought about putting a label on it.

Social, refers to the system in which humans thrive – a society – not the spare-time enjoyment flavour, although, spare-time and enjoyment are some of the key aspects of social learning – well, learning in short.

The main concept behind social learning is that ‘no man is an island’, that we learn best when we are interacting and collaborating with others – this works well in the workplace (usually) but is often penalised in school, branded as copying or worse.

Of course there are teachers who are aware of the shortcomings of  the traditional educational model, who are actively putting into place activities that are dragging the classroom into the 21st century, leveraging social media and technology to facilitate this.

However, the dynamics of social learning are not used in any formal testing system – there are no marking criteria that I am aware of that take into account group collaboration or serendipitous learning. Arguments that I have heard are that they are just too complex to evaluate … so let’s just stay with evaluating what we know how to evaluate – right and wrong answers on a formal test / evaluation / examination.

Now, we can all recognise that it will take a virtual (sic) revolution in education to implement any form of evaluation system to encompass the variables of social learning.

We all can see that, but there will surely come a time, when the head will need to removed from the sand, if only to adapt to technological change, which in turn is driving social change.

1 Comment

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    Keep up to date with what's happening

    Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

    You have Successfully Subscribed!

    Share This